Skip to main content

Minimum Maximum Stack

Problem : Design a stack of Numbers which will give you the minimum and maximum of all the elements it contains.

This problem is also known as MinStack or MaxStack problem which expects you to find only the minimum or maximum. It is restated here to capture both. A stack typically has push(), pop() and size() operations. In order to find the minimum and the maximum, we will need to iterate over the elements of the stack each time we want to find the minimum and maximum. This will result in O (n) time complexity. And typically stack does not let us iterate over the elements. Many do not know that the java.util.Stack implementation does allow it as it extends java.util.Vector.

We can make it more efficient by storing the minimum and maximum as instance variables in our stack and update them when ever we push a new number on to the stack. This will result in O(1) complexity for updating the max and min when pushing new numbers on stack, but when we pop the number which is currently set as the maximum or minimum, we need to iterate and find the max and min again. This would result in O(n) complexity again.

We can make it more efficient by using a helper data structure like a SortedSet which ensures O (log n) complexity for adding, deleting and contains operations. Since the numbers being pushed on to the stack will be sorted in the sorted set, we can get the maximum and minimum in O (1). Here is the code for this -


package org.blogkoder.algorithms.stack;

import java.util.SortedSet;
import java.util.TreeSet;
import java.util.Stack;

/**
* User: blogkoder
* Copyright : blogkoder
*/

/**
* This is an implementation of a numbers stack which also
* gives the minimum and maximum of the numbers.
*/
public class MinMaxStack<Number>
{
private SortedSet<Number> sortedSet = new TreeSet<Number>();

private Stack<Number> stack = new Stack<Number>();

/**
* This pushes the number on to the stack.
*
* SortedSet ensures insertion at O (log n)
*
* @param number
*/
public void push(Number number)
{
stack.push(number);

sortedSet.add(number);
}

/**
* This pops the number off the stack.
*
* SortedSet ensures removal at O (log n)
*
* @return Number
* @exception java.util.EmptyStackException if this stack is empty.
*/
public Number pop()
{
Number number = stack.pop();
sortedSet.remove(number);

return number;
}

/**
* Returns the maximum at constant time O (1).
*
* @return Number - maximum of the elements in the stack.
*
* @exception java.util.NoSuchElementException - if the stack is empty.
*/
public Number maximum()
{
return sortedSet.last();
}

/**
* Returns the maximum at constant time O (1).
*
* @return Number - minimum of the elements in the stack.
*
* @exception java.util.NoSuchElementException - if the stack is empty.
*/
public Number minimum()
{
return sortedSet.first();
}
}

But this will not handle duplicate values. Since we are using a Set, it does not allow duplicate values. So if we push duplicate numbers on the stack and pop one of them, then the maximum/minimum will not return the right value. The fix for this is to wrap the Number with a unique id and override the equals method of the wrapper. I leave this to you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Find the number of trailing zeroes in the factorial of a given number.

Problem : Find the number of trailing zeroes in the factorial of a given number. This is an interesting problem. Simple way to solve this is to find the factorial of the number and then count the number of trailing zeroes. But there is a more efficient way to find the number of trailing zeroes, without even finding the factorial of the number. The number of trailing zeroes in 5! is 1, 10! is 2, 15! is 3, 20! is 4, but 25! is 6. Then 30! is 7, 35! is 8, 40! is 9, 45! is 10 but 50! is 12 and so on. So for every multiple of 25, the number of zeroes increases by 2 and for every multiple of 5, the number of zeroes increase by 1. So any number less than 5 has 0 trailing zeroes. Any number between 5 and 10 will have 1 zero, between 10 and 15 will have 2 zeroes and so on. Here is a simple C program implementation of this algorithm. import java.io.BufferedReader; import java.io.InputStreamReader; /** * * @author blogkoder * */ public class TrailingZeroesCalculator { public static void m...

Find missing integer problem

Problem : G iven an array of size 99 which has integers from 1 to 100 and with no integer being repeated, can you find the integer which is not in the array ? There are many differeny ways of solving this problem. The most efficient solution is to just find the difference between the sum of all integers from 1 to 100 and the sum of all integers in the array. This algorithm has a running complexity of  O (n)  and a space complexity of  O (1)  since it just needs 2 variables to store the sums . Here is the code for this -   /**      * This will find the missing integer in the given array of size 99.      *      * The array has integers between 1 and 100 with one integer      * missing.      *      * @param array - Array of integers b/w 1 and 100 of size 99.      * @return int - the missing integer number.      */     public static int findMissingInteger(int[] array)     {         int sum = 0;          // This has the complexity of O (n)         for (int i = 0; i         {             sum...