Skip to main content

Minimum Maximum Stack

Problem : Design a stack of Numbers which will give you the minimum and maximum of all the elements it contains.

This problem is also known as MinStack or MaxStack problem which expects you to find only the minimum or maximum. It is restated here to capture both. A stack typically has push(), pop() and size() operations. In order to find the minimum and the maximum, we will need to iterate over the elements of the stack each time we want to find the minimum and maximum. This will result in O (n) time complexity. And typically stack does not let us iterate over the elements. Many do not know that the java.util.Stack implementation does allow it as it extends java.util.Vector.

We can make it more efficient by storing the minimum and maximum as instance variables in our stack and update them when ever we push a new number on to the stack. This will result in O(1) complexity for updating the max and min when pushing new numbers on stack, but when we pop the number which is currently set as the maximum or minimum, we need to iterate and find the max and min again. This would result in O(n) complexity again.

We can make it more efficient by using a helper data structure like a SortedSet which ensures O (log n) complexity for adding, deleting and contains operations. Since the numbers being pushed on to the stack will be sorted in the sorted set, we can get the maximum and minimum in O (1). Here is the code for this -


package org.blogkoder.algorithms.stack;

import java.util.SortedSet;
import java.util.TreeSet;
import java.util.Stack;

/**
* User: blogkoder
* Copyright : blogkoder
*/

/**
* This is an implementation of a numbers stack which also
* gives the minimum and maximum of the numbers.
*/
public class MinMaxStack<Number>
{
private SortedSet<Number> sortedSet = new TreeSet<Number>();

private Stack<Number> stack = new Stack<Number>();

/**
* This pushes the number on to the stack.
*
* SortedSet ensures insertion at O (log n)
*
* @param number
*/
public void push(Number number)
{
stack.push(number);

sortedSet.add(number);
}

/**
* This pops the number off the stack.
*
* SortedSet ensures removal at O (log n)
*
* @return Number
* @exception java.util.EmptyStackException if this stack is empty.
*/
public Number pop()
{
Number number = stack.pop();
sortedSet.remove(number);

return number;
}

/**
* Returns the maximum at constant time O (1).
*
* @return Number - maximum of the elements in the stack.
*
* @exception java.util.NoSuchElementException - if the stack is empty.
*/
public Number maximum()
{
return sortedSet.last();
}

/**
* Returns the maximum at constant time O (1).
*
* @return Number - minimum of the elements in the stack.
*
* @exception java.util.NoSuchElementException - if the stack is empty.
*/
public Number minimum()
{
return sortedSet.first();
}
}

But this will not handle duplicate values. Since we are using a Set, it does not allow duplicate values. So if we push duplicate numbers on the stack and pop one of them, then the maximum/minimum will not return the right value. The fix for this is to wrap the Number with a unique id and override the equals method of the wrapper. I leave this to you.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Even Integer Iterator

Problem : Given an iterator of integers, can you give me back another iterator which iterates over the given iterator of integers such that the new iterator gives only even integers. There a couple of different ways to solve this problem. * The first option is to create a new list of integers and add only the even integers from the given iterator and then return an iterator by calling list.iterator(). This has a time complexity of O (n) but also has a space complexity of O (n) in the worst case, which is not desirable. Here is the code for it - public static Iterator<Integer> giveEvenIntegersIterator(Iterator<Integer> iterator) { List<Integer> evenIntegers = new ArrayList<Integer>(); if (iterator != null) { while(iterator.hasNext()) { Integer number = iterator.next(); if (number != null && number % 2 == 0) { evenIntegers.add(number); } } } retu

Sum of Subsets - Find how many pairs in the given array sum to a given number

Problem : Given an array of integers intArray[] and another integer sum, find how many pairs of numbers in the given array will sum up to the given sum. This problem is one of the most sought after question in interviews. There may be slight variations of this problem. There are many ways to solve this problem. The most efficient solution considering both time and space complexity is the one discussed below - /** * This will find how many pairs of numbers in the given array sum * up to the given number. * * @param array - array of integers * @param sum - The sum * @return int - number of pairs. */ public static int sumOfSubset(int[] array, int sum) {          // This has a complexity of O ( n lg n )         Arrays.sort(array);         int pairCount = 0;         int leftIndex = 0;         int rightIndex = array.length - 1;          // The portion below has a complextiy of         //  O ( n ) in the worst case.         while (array[rightIndex] >= su

Flatten Iterator

Problem: Given an iterator of iterators, can you give me back an iterator which flattens the given iterator. Ex : Suppose you are given an iterator which has these objects - "1", "2", "3", , , then the flattened iterator returned by you should have "1", "2", "3", "4", "5", "6", "7", "8", "9". Iterators may be nested to any level. This problem can be solved by implementing a FlattenIterator which takes in the given iterator as an agrument in the constructor and delegating the hasNext() and next() calls to the given iterator using a stack. The given iterator is pushed on to the stack. Nested iterators are pushed on to the stack before traversing and once there are no more elements in the iterator, it is popped from the stack. Here is the code - import java.util.*; /** * User: blogkoder * Date: Jul 28, 2008 * Time: 9:32:39 PM */ public class FlattenIterator implement